http://glu.ttono.us/articles/2006/09/10/arts-and-page-some_id-hide en-us 40 <p>Hi guys. One of the reasons <a href="http://glu.ttono.us/articles/2006/05/29/guide-test-driven-rjs-with-arts">ARTS</a> still doesn&#8217;t have support for the square bracket syntax of RJS is that I haven&#8217;t thought of a form of assertion I&#8217;d like. I think this might work:</p> <div class="typocode"><pre><code class="typocode_ruby "><span class="ident">assert_rjs</span> <span class="symbol">:page</span><span class="punct">,</span> <span class="punct">'</span><span class="string">foo_id</span><span class="punct">',</span> <span class="symbol">:toggle</span></code></pre></div> <p><code>:page</code> is used to denote the <code>[]</code> syntax and <code>foo_id</code> is the id of the element we&#8217;re working with. All subsequent chained methods follow afterwards as symbols like <code>:toggle</code>.</p> <p>This example would match <code>page['foo_id'].toggle</code>.</p> <p>What do you think? Do you have a better idea? Please do give me your thoughts. This is the one major hole in ARTS and I&#8217;d like to get it patched up.</p> Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:55:00 -0400 urn:uuid:0611afec-bf68-4e5a-b931-4a054f92d925 kev http://glu.ttono.us/articles/2006/09/10/arts-and-page-some_id-hide Rails testing <code>:[]</code> is a valid symbol in Ruby, so you could also do something like: <pre><code> assert_rjs :[], 'foo_id', :toggle </code></pre> <code>:page</code> is less cryptic, but <code>:[]</code> is tied directly to the way you&#8217;d be doing the RJS. Either way would be just fine. Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:01:28 -0400 urn:uuid:05521c54-d6c1-448b-8b9a-99f37a71bd65 http://glu.ttono.us/articles/2006/09/10/arts-and-page-some_id-hide#comment-1182